Skip to content

Revisiting the Arsenal Ship

October 6, 2007
The Arsenal Ship-A 21st Century Battleship

Some may recall the Arsenal Ship as an attempt by the Navy to create a new battleship for the Cruise Missile era. Basically it was a low-cost, low-tech missile barge which was world’s opposite from the hi-tech, hi-cost wonders such as super carriers and Aegis cruisers currently on the Admirals’ wish list. Reading this 1995 NY Times article describing the revolutionary new warship, one can see why the carrier bloc within the Pentagon must have been a little worried about the future of their pet projects:

Aircraft Carrier May Give Way To Missile Ship

After 50 years as the global symbol of America’s military might, the aircraft carrier may soon be shoved off center stage by a new warship that would be able to rain 500 missiles within a matter of minutes on targets hundreds of miles away, without risking pilots’ lives.

Prospects for that ship, which is still on the drawing board but could be in the fleet within five years, raise questions about how many new carriers the Navy will need. A carrier costs $4.5 billion to build and $440 million a year to operate. The new ship, essentially a floating missile barge, might cost only $500 million and just tens of millions a year to run.

The new ship would fire Tomahawk cruise missiles, long-range artillery shells or rocket barrages against ammunition dumps, command posts and artillery, for instance, the same targets that warplanes flying off the carrier Roosevelt were bombing in Bosnia this week…

I can see the red flags going up all over the Pentagon at the thought of losing even one aircraft carrier. So what became of the Arsenal Ship? Despite the potential that such a vessel might have in being far more survivable as well as more relevant for 21st Century warfare, it was quietly canceled in early 1997 in favor of the still unbuilt DDX destroyers.

Plans were for the Arsenal Ship to enter service by 2001, which would have been just in time for the opening of the War on Terror after 9/11. Can you imagine the Taliban’s reaction when a warship with up to 1000 cruise missiles appeared in the Indian Ocean, all aimed to strike their corrupt regime? Likely they would have given us Osama Bin Laden’s head on a silver platter! Not to mention the oft-sanctions defying Saddam Hussein, who knew from experience the power of such new age weapons against his Cold War era air defense system.


Besides an immense missile-firing platform, other unique extras in the design included:

  • Very small crew-Only 50 were deemed necessary to operate the 500-800 foot craft. Compare this to 300 on much smaller destroyer, or 6000 needed to crew a Nimitz class aircraft carrier.
  • Low cost-The initial version cost about $450 million, or about the price of the tiny new littoral combat ship. The huge weapons payload would have added to the cost, but still come in far less than the $6-$8 billion price tag of a heavy carrier.
  • Water armor-Plans were for the ship to have ballast tanks similar to a submarine, which could be filled to provide a low profile in enemy waters. An added benefit to this, as proved in the Tanker War of the 1980’s, is that such a vessel providing its own buoyancy would be extremely difficult to sink.
  • A Digitized Warship-She could have been operated by remote control, with her weapons systems tied into to other Aegis Ships or AWACS aircraft, and aimed accordingly. She would have been an integral part of the US Ballistic Missile Defense program.

In 1996, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jeremy Boorda committed suicide. Boorda was the chief proponent of the radical new design, and with him went the hopes for fielding the Arsenal Ship. Admittedly, in a time of Clinton defense slashing and without a clear enemy at sea due to the end of the Cold War, such an untried vessel stood little chance. Still, I can’t help but imagine the carrier admirals breathing a collective sigh of relief with the fall of this latest threat to their dominance of the defense budget.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. June 8, 2017 3:44 pm

    Dieses hätte von Lexer (1931) erkannt Werden
    können. Es kann, schon hier, angenommen
    werden, dass er dies Anerkennen abwenden
    wollte. Zwischen Deutsche Mark Einschätzen der Plastischen Chirurgie
    als Wiederherstellungs-Chirurgie/-Technik hat
    er Chip anliegend dem Begriff dieser Plastischen Chirurgie
    übergeordnet notwendige „Kunst des Heilens“
    (Porter 2000) nicht berücksichtigt.
    Angesichts jenes Nichtbeachten welcher in dem Wort
    „plastisch“ immanenten ästhetischen Ausmaß
    konnte er Chip wesentlichen, differenzierenden
    auch speziellen Eigenschaften dieser Plastischen
    Chirurgie verschweigen. Damit blieb von Seiten ihm
    jenes Lebensregel welcher Maßeinheit welcher Chirurgie
    als allgemeines
    Department unübertroffen. Dieses abstrakte
    Wort „Kunst“ (Kluge 1989) blieb also welcher allgemeinen
    Chirurgie zusichern.
    Inbegriffen Sicht auf die dargestellte Fabel erweist
    sich, dass ein Hauptanteil jener von Lexer (1931)
    definierten „Wiederherstellungschirurgie“ aktuell
    DEM Areal welcher Plastischen Chirurgie zugeordnet
    worden war. Dieffenbach, ordentlicher Professor
    z. Hd. Chirurgie an der Königlichen Akademie in
    Berlin, hatte Chip „Plastische Chirurgie“ (1845–
    1848) (▶ Abschn. 2.3) charakterisiert
    » … als den Wiederersatz (die Wiederherstellung)
    eines unrettbar gegangenen oder die
    Schaffung jener Qualität eines verstümmelten
    Theils des menschlichen Körpers (angeborene
    oder erlittene Deformität) zum Thema machen wir
    Plastische Chirurgie. Ein großes, wichtiges,
    künstlerisches Gebiet, hinaus DEM Chip Physiologie
    der Chirurgie Chip Hand reicht Dieffenbach
    1845/48, S. 14).

  2. October 19, 2014 3:02 pm

    Buying a laptop is a sort of investment, when buying, one searches for ideal features fitted
    to once needs in addition to quality service warranty of repair and
    replacement. Your answers will determine what sort of the
    laptop bag or case you need to look for once you shop.
    Best laptops for college freshmen 2014 This provides the best of
    both worlds, and while this could seem pricey, the general cost will be much less compared to price of
    any laptop capable of keeping up having a $800 desktop.

    A common mistake university students and even average adults make is usually to come up with a monthly budget
    and save whatever cash is left. You are 40% very likely
    to experience a failure within several years if your
    obtain a laptop in the least reliable brand, HP, instead of from the most reliable brand, ASUS.

  3. September 20, 2014 4:02 pm

    And of course, I come with an app from my cable provider so when I am about the road which enable
    it to’t get home to view that NFL playoff came, I can set it up to record to my
    DVR. However, in relation to CCTV video, content instead of quality
    takes preference. Get black and white cctv dvr single camera system The
    IP CCTV system can conserve businesses a huge selection of valuable pounds a year
    if correctly fitted.

    Their idea associated with an original thought is to apply their DVR to record
    “The biggest loser” to allow them to watch
    “Dancing with the Stars” instead. Before we even thought about the shop we wanted to create a
    CCTV knowledge base which people could use like a point of reference so they didn’t
    find yourself wasting money.

  4. Mike Burleson permalink
    October 9, 2007 3:41 pm

    Works for me! I call it “warships off the shelf”.

  5. west_rhino permalink
    October 9, 2007 3:09 pm

    One could borrow modular concepts of the LCS and just work out a series of container that could be staged on cargo ships and muddle the tracking issues for an opponent. Shades of operating Harrier FRS Mk1s from Atlantic Conveyor…

Trackbacks

  1. Empty Oceans Pt 2 « New Wars
  2. The Navy After Next Pt 2 « New Wars
  3. An Affordable Fleet « New Wars

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: