Skip to content

Democrats Seek to Protect Pork Weapons

October 8, 2008

It’s a matter of two philosophies. Fight the war you have now or worry about the next war (itis?). From CQ Politics:

Democrats in Congress are beginning to push back against plans to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps, signaling that they will protect the sophisticated weapons systems that constituents and contractors value in the upcoming debate over resources…

John P. Murtha , D-Pa., chairman of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, said that plans to increase by 2013 the end strength of the Army and Marine Corps by 65,000 and 27,000 troops, respectively, must be scaled back to pay for rebuilding the military after seven years of war and buying weapons for the future.

“[The Defense Department] is going to have to cut personnel in order to pay for procurement. . . . I don’t know that they are going to be able to keep growing the Army,” said Murtha, adding, “Personnel costs are out of control.”

This idea may not be as bad as its sounds. Historically America has always cut troops strength at the end of all its wars. With Iraq as good as won and Afghanistan soon to get the full “Petraeus Treatment”, we can see where reducing the number of troops, or at least freezing the total we now have might be feasible.

But we had our heart set on a “million man army” and there is still a way to make this happen, by reducing the budget share of the other high tech services, whose interest in the essential counter-insurgency warfare has been slight. The USN is still top heavy in battleships, while the Air Force has shown little interest in replacing excellent and well used close-support bombers like the indispensable A-10 Warthog. Both of the latter Departments have plans that involve less numbers for your buck, so whatever isn’t working should be scrapped with the money going to what does work, and that is the Army’s counter-insurgency plans.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. charbookguy permalink
    October 8, 2008 9:08 pm

    Murtha is the closest thing that party has to a “Hawk”, so long as that party is in power…But I do agree with you.

  2. Gerry permalink
    October 8, 2008 8:41 pm

    The 1st thing any new administration needs to do is get rid of Murtha. He is a national embarrasment. The second thing the new administration needs to do is end the war in Afganistan via an invasion into the sanctuaries in Pakistan, kill the foriegn terrorists and Al Qaeda, then promise a few billion in support to the Afgan government while we withdraw. The savings between the end of the war in Iraq plus the end of the war in Afganistan can be returned to our economy with a portion used to rebuild our forces. Modern equipment, new aircraft (fighters, bombers as well as UAVs) and decent pay for the volunteer military. Everyone wins except Murtha, who is a loser to begin with.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: