Skip to content

HSV Swift gives lessons in “soft power”

January 14, 2009

090111-N-9995B-001I have always felt that the Incat and Austal built catamaran ferries, leased by the US Army and Navy early this decade as testbeds for the littoral combat ship concept, should have been purchased outright and placed to work in this role. No need for going to the ship designers and creating a brand new costly and complicated warship program, which is what the $500 million USS Freedom has become. The HSV Swift and her kin have continued with the LCS role already without bells or whistles, proving the concept of warfare off the shelf works. Read this from the Navy Times:

Boat repair, port security and basic law enforcement are part of the core curriculum available from the trainers aboard the high-speed vessel Swift, now three nations deep into a seven-nation tour of Central and South America as the United States’ floating embassy. Dubbed the “southern partnership station,” the Swift is becoming a regular visitor to many ports in the 4th Fleet area of operations, which is exactly what the Navy wants.

“This puts the U.S. military in good standing down here with these countries,” said Cmdr. Chris Barnes, the Swift’s mission commander, who spoke to Navy Times from Jamaica.

The Swift is performing missions which the Big Ship Navy can’t do, and is likely equally effective. She isn’t scaring anyone with her “presence” as say, a giant Aegis battleship or supercarrier might, but she still is a symbol of the awesome firepower the US Navy is able to bear upon any potential foe if needed.

The Swift is an entirely self-contained, military-to-military training center. It has a customizable mission bay; its own complement of small boats that students can practice repairing; and its own onboard classrooms. When the ship pulls into an austere port and the host military doesn’t have its own training center, local sailors or coast guardsmen can come aboard the Swift.

The article goes on to declare the USN and Army will purchase a total of 10 similar craft, dubbed the Joint High Speed Vessel. Here’s a thought-why not cancel or cutback some of the current LCS class which is untested and costly, buy or lease more of these well tested and highly effective littoral ships in its place?

030225-N-1050K-001From left, the Navy’s Joint Venture (HSV-X1) and the Army’s Spearhead (TSV-1X) are high-speed catamarans designed and built by Australian shipbuilders.

13 Comments leave one →
  1. Mike Burleson permalink
    June 24, 2009 7:26 pm

    Likely could do an HSV Swift search within the blog and come up with numerous more. Or you could also search in the USN site here:

    http://www.navy.mil/view_photos_top.asp

  2. siddharth permalink
    June 24, 2009 1:29 pm

    those are the best pics i hav ever seen.
    i would be obliged if u could show more pics with more details.

  3. Mike Burleson permalink
    January 15, 2009 8:18 pm

    Yeah, I thought that was interesting that Swift was now civilian crewed. I suppose I keep referring to Swift as representative of the Aussie cats as a whole. As you say others are doing good work.

  4. leesea permalink
    January 15, 2009 5:49 pm

    The point is as I suggested on the “other” site that an HSV can be chartered and tested and operated for a helluva lot less thant the $185 mil JHSV. I think Swift’s per diem is just over $38k plus fuel and reimsbursables.

    I have real concerns about wave piercing HSVs speedy yes relaible – jury is out.

    Plessss stop acting like the Swift is the only HSV under contract to the Navy. HSV WestPac Express (on whose design the JHSV is based) has been hauling Marines and their gear around for more than 7 years. It hauls more and spends more time at see than Swift ever does (smaller cargo capacity & ramps). BTW Swift is now time chartered and civilian crewed by Sealift Inc a small US shipping company with extensive experience.

    Also the X-bow ship is only one of about a dozen possible platforms I have proposed. It is more in the mini-mothership category. Maybe the color scheme caught his attention? heehee

  5. Mike Burleson permalink
    January 15, 2009 9:02 am

    Goes to show you looks aren’t everything, Distiller, as also proved by leesea’s mothership!

    http://informationdissemination.blogspot.com/2009/01/lees-mothership.html

  6. Mike Burleson permalink
    January 15, 2009 8:55 am

    “I don’t see high speed as necessary in mothership”

    In the littorals, sure. but it might be handy surging to a warzone via ocean transit. What I like about the HSV is, its a tried and true platform tested in a warzone, affordable and ready now. None of this can be said of the LCS.

  7. Distiller permalink
    January 15, 2009 1:10 am

    Now that the Navy has enough experience with HSV-2, they should do a proper evaluation of LCS-1, LCS-2 and HSV-2 side-by-side and build the most fitting. Well, guess that would be too straight forward. Anyway. I like the visual appearance of LCS-2, the most warship-like of the three, though maybe HSV-2 is the most capable for the intended mission.

  8. leesea permalink
    January 14, 2009 3:01 pm

    as warships go I think the Seafigther has the most potential as an HSV mothership in the Galrahn concept. BUT as you and I see the mothership as an enabler, there are other HSVs not LCS which work much better and can be had for much less. Austal’s MRC comes to mind on the small side of APD. Therir 125 meter cat on the larger side. Many other ships in the logistics or sealift ship mode coud be motherships or GFS which is on the Navy’s menu.

    Personally I don’t see high speed as necessary in mothership, maybe in tactical sealift ship like JHSV should be and WPE is. That goes back to your view of the navy and “hauling freight” beneath the blue water types?

  9. Mike Burleson permalink
    January 14, 2009 2:50 pm

    Thanks for the extra info leesea! they are rather spartan as you say but not having any “LCS systems” seems to be in its favor. Then we could focus on the HSV more for logistical support of unmanned vessels as Gahlran wishes for the more pricey LCS. Of course, the USN just doesn’t care. Let them haul freight and satisfy the reformers, while the Big Ships do the real fighting is their attitude, except they aren’t.

  10. leesea permalink
    January 14, 2009 12:05 pm

    Mike those are charters not leases. The advantage to the arrangemment is that the Navy could test the HSV type and let the ships go off charter at the end of the contract and/or charter something bigger and better. Neither of which happened, why? IMHO NAVSEA saw all chartered HSVs as competitors to their beloved LCS and JHSV. The later I am familiar with and is over-specified which drove its cost up to $185 mil for first ship.

    BTW charters can be written to purchase the ship at the end of charter BUT someone has to come up with the bucks to do that. I did not see any regular navy type stand up with a checkbook in hand to buy any HSV recently?

    The Swift does not have ANY “LCS systems” onboard as does the SeaFigther. So I do not see Swift as a testbed so much as proof of concept. Maybe that is why the USN did not buy her but just time chartered the ship again?

    On a negative note, the Swift is not being used to its full advantage. Its being used as a small school ship. There is nothing in its current mission which cannot be done better and cheaper with a conventional hulled ship. The Swift was re-chartered because the folks at WNY had drug out the JHSV procurement and the Navy needed a stopgap hull. BTW the navy broke some inernals early on because the INCAT hulls as not a strong as Austal.

    Please do not forget the HSV WestPac Express which has successfully been hauling Marine and their gear around the western hemisphere for more than 7 years. Not a testbed but a workhorse. Of course that show my preference for real tactical sealift ships. JHSV – the jury is out on and first is several years out. Which brings me back to my first & your last point. Charter NOW and use more HSVs then after operational experience is gained go buy some.

Trackbacks

  1. The Navy’s New Grand Strategy Pt 2 « New Wars
  2. Top New Wars Posts « New Wars
  3. Send the Swift to Somalia « New Wars

Leave a comment